The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission found insufficient evidence of discrimination at the Mt. Airy Art Garage.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active subscription, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission has concluded its investigation into allegations of discrimination at the Mt. Airy Art Garage and found insufficient evidence to support claims of homophobia and censorship. The controversy, which began in April 2023, involved MAAG co-founder Arleen Olshan and the organization's board of directors.
In a letter dated June 12, 2024, the PHRC stated that there was "insufficient evidence to support a finding of probable cause that Mt. Airy Garage violated the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act." The commission investigated claims of public accommodation discrimination filed by Olshan on August 10, 2023.
The dispute originated when two pieces of Olshan's artwork – a black and white sketch of three nude lesbians and another of two women kissing – were turned to face her studio, blocking them from public view. Olshan, who is 78 and identifies as a lesbian, alleged that this action was discriminatory and homophobic.
However, the PHRC's investigation found that MAAG had "removed Complainant's art in accordance with Rules and Regulations that Complainant helped create and implement." The commission noted that similar rules were applied to other artists, regardless of their protected class status.
MAAG Board President Patricia Smith had previously denied allegations of censorship and homophobia, stating that Olshan's work had "never been censored or taken down from the gallery or gift shop." Smith explained that the artwork in question was hung outside Olshan's studio, which violated rules applicable to all studio owners.
Smith said she hopes this settles the matter.
"The PHRC finding goes a long way in healing the hurt these false allegations have caused everyone at MAAG. We are now looking forward to moving ahead with our name cleared," she said.
While MAAG has been cleared of discrimination charges, the incident has prompted institutional discussions about inclusivity and representation, she said, and the organization aims to move forward in its mission of providing opportunities for artists and maintaining a welcoming space for all community members.
